The Lost Feed

🌐Old Internet

JPEG XL Removed From Chromium: What It Means

The advanced JPEG XL image format is gone from Chromium. Discover why it was removed and what this means for web images and future formats.

0 views·4 min read·Jun 20, 2026
JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium

It's a quiet decision, but one that might change how you see images online. The team behind the Chrome browser, known as Chromium, has made a big change. They've decided to remove support for a new image format called JPEG XL.

This format promised better quality and smaller file sizes. It was seen as a potential upgrade from the old JPEG standard we've used for decades. But now, it's out before it really got a chance to shine on the web.

What is JPEG XL and Why Was It Exciting?

JPEG XL was developed as a next-generation image format. Its main goal was to improve upon the limitations of the current JPEG format. Think of it as a super-powered version of the JPEGs you see everywhere today.

It offered features like lossless compression, meaning you could save an image without losing any quality. It also boasted better compression for lossy images, making files smaller while keeping them looking sharp. This was a big deal for websites that need to load images quickly.

Another cool thing about JPEG XL was its support for animation and wider color ranges. It could handle more colors than standard JPEGs, leading to more realistic and vivid pictures. It was designed to be a versatile format for many different uses.

The Road to Removal: A Short History

JPEG XL was added to Chromium as an experimental feature not too long ago. This means it was available but not fully turned on for everyone by default. It was a way for developers to test it out and see how it worked in the real world.

During this testing phase, the team gathered feedback and data. They looked at how well it performed and if people were actually using it. The idea was to see if it was ready for a full launch across all users.

However, the path to becoming a standard web format is tough. Many different companies and groups have to agree on its usefulness and adopt it. Even with its technical strengths, getting widespread support is the real challenge.

Why Was JPEG XL Removed From Chromium?

The official reason given for removing JPEG XL from Chromium is a lack of community adoption. While the technology itself was impressive, it didn't gain the traction needed to become a widely used standard.

This often happens with new technologies. Even if something is better, it needs many different companies and browsers to support it to be truly successful. Without that broad agreement, it's hard for a format to take off.

The decision was made because there wasn't enough widespread interest or adoption from other browser makers and web developers. It's a common hurdle for new web standards.

Essentially, Google (the main force behind Chromium) felt that the effort to maintain and develop JPEG XL support wasn't justified by its current use or future potential in the wider web ecosystem. They decided to focus their resources elsewhere.

What Does This Mean for Web Images?

The removal of JPEG XL from Chromium means that most web users won't see its benefits directly. If you use Chrome, Edge, Opera, or other Chromium-based browsers, your browser will no longer be able to display JPEG XL images.

This is a setback for those hoping for a quicker upgrade to better image quality online. Websites will likely continue to rely on existing formats like JPEG, PNG, and WebP for the foreseeable future. These formats are well-established and supported everywhere.

It also means that the push for more efficient and higher-quality images on the web might slow down. JPEG XL offered a clear path forward, and its removal leaves a gap.

The

Future of Image Formats

While JPEG XL's journey in Chromium has ended, it doesn't mean the end of image format innovation. The need for better web images is still there.

Formats like WebP, developed by Google, have already seen significant adoption. WebP offers good compression and quality, and it's supported by most modern browsers. It's currently the most popular alternative to JPEG.

There are also other formats being developed and considered. The web is always looking for ways to improve loading times and visual quality. JPEG XL might find a home in other areas, even if not on the main web.

Lessons Learned from JPEG XL's Short Stint

The story of JPEG XL in Chromium is a good reminder of how the internet works. A great technology isn't enough on its own. It needs support from many different players to become a success.

For a new format to win, it needs:

  • Browser Support: Major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge need to agree to use it.

  • Developer Buy-in: Website creators and app developers need to start using the format.

  • Industry Agreement: Companies that make hardware and software need to support it too.

JPEG XL faced challenges in getting all these groups on board. Its removal from Chromium shows that even promising technologies can face an uphill battle.

It's a bit disappointing for those who saw JPEG XL as the future. But the quest for better web images continues. We'll have to wait and see what format, if any, will eventually replace the old JPEG standard.

How does this make you feel?

Comments

0/2000

Loading comments...